Communication Trap Number One — Blaming the Strawberry

January 14th, 2009

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-18XXZMjy4

This segment develops the concept and necessity for each member of a couple to take ownership of their own reactions.

We use the analogy of a person who goes to a picnic, not knowing s/he has an allergy to strawberries. Of course, everyone has strawberries, and no one else gets hives. Yet the allergy victim wants to blame the strawberries. “Bad batch!” Couples upset in their own homes do not have the advantage of seeing someone to their left or right who is having no such reaction. It seems obvious that my reaction is “caused” by my mate. As long as I fail to perceive the inner “allergies” that drive my reactions, frequently present long before I met my mate, I will continue to blame him/her. And we will not communicate.

What is a Realization?

January 14th, 2009

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7DsSrcNNrQs

Speaking as a psychotherapist, the speaker shares that clients often make the mistake of telling him they “realize” something. He then inflicts this mini-lecture on them. Pointing to an imaginary table, he develops the analogy of what would happen if he did not realize it was there. For instance, he would trip over it when he got up to answer the phone. Then he spells out the difference when he does finally realize it is there. Reality does not necessarily change, but we do. And when we live in a reality that is new to us, we have new choices, choices that were not possible beforehand.

Why is the Moment of Relapse so Important?

January 14th, 2009

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XzbzqDLWv28

We start by acknowledging the importance of the process of relapse. However, it is clear from observation and experience that many people in recovery go in and out of the process of relapse without ever actually taking that first physical drink or drug. What is the difference? Those who relapse make a decision to actually pick up the first drink or drug, and do so. Universally, this decision is voiced in their own minds by two kinds of thinking, “wishful” and “expletive.” It is the thinking that reveals what has gone so terribly wrong. Whether by individual exploration or group exercise, we can help victims of this thinking to see what has happened to them and what to do about it. And that is why the moment of relapse is so important.

How the Headhunter has to Cope

January 14th, 2009

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4PtnSvGoNU

This tongue-in-cheek parable exploits the suffering of a headhunter who has harvested the head of an anthropologist.

DuWors, the one who created the scenario, reads into the camera. We hear of poor Charlie, who is frustrated when the head he tried to shrink comes out lop-sided, due to a procedural error on his part. We are then treated to a cross-cultural analysis of coping as the necessary response to a universal experience, frustration. We are then introduced to a formula from this culture that would apply across cultures, religions, and even non-religions. It is the common-sense principle embedded in the “Serenity Prayer.” Namely, that each human must face our problem, sorting it into two piles, that which I control and that which I don’t. Only then can we get on with the work of specifically reducing our frustration.

The Five Cravings

January 14th, 2009

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5DpaTDTVuwo

This segment describes five different forms of addictive craving. We begin with the two related to use itself — withdrawal craving and the “craving” described by AA as triggered by ingestion. Craving triggered by a reminder cue is compared to the “drooling” of Pavlov’s dogs. Craving for escape is tied to stress. Lastly, we discuss the “subliminal craving” which takes over thought and memory, without being felt.

What is Co-Dependence?

January 14th, 2009

httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VeYpyUQB-GI&feature=channel_page

We start with a simple definition: “Codependence” is taking responsibility for another’s problem instead of taking responsibility for my own. We then look at an analogy in which a person takes fanatical care of a fleet of rental cars, working eight hours for minimum wage and another four for free, only to drive off in a beater with bald tires and a cloud of smoke.